![]() Historic Vegetation |
|
The maps of historic vegetation on this website, reconstructed from General Land Office
survey records, are a reliable depiction of the range of forest composition in the
northern Lake States over a long time period, with the exception of areas inside the
boundaries of fire-susceptible ecosystems. This statement is based on evidence of: (1) the
stabilized migration of forest species into the northern Lake States about 3,000 to 3,500
years ago (Davis 1981, Davis et al. 1993), (2) the extremely old age of forests in mesic
hemlock-hardwood ecosystems (Frelich 1995), (3) the limited variety of possible community
types and successional pathways within fire-susceptible ecosystems, (4) the affinity of
certain forest species to specific geologic features due to moisture-nutrient-competition
interactions that prevented extreme change in forest composition, and (5) the persistence
of vegetation even given minor climatic fluctuations (Pielou 1991).
The original land survey by the General Land Office (GLO) provides the earliest
systematically recorded information on forest composition in the Lake States. The GLO
surveys began in 1826 in Michigan, 1832 in Wisconsin, and 1847 in Minnesota (Stearns
1996). GLO surveyors noted tree species and their diameters along section lines, providing
a grid of transects approximately one mile apart. Locations of recently burned areas,
windthrows, beaver impoundments, rivers and streams, wetlands, existing settlements,
trails and roads, and agricultural potential of soils were also recorded, and generalized
maps of timber types and soil quality were prepared.
GLO records have been used for many years to provide information on tree species
composition, diameter size distribution, and disturbance patches in the pre-European
settlement forests of the Lake States (Cottam 1949, Stearns 1949, Bourdo 1956, 1983,
Cottam and Curtis 1956, Curtis 1959, Loucks 1983, Whitney 1986, 1987, Frelich 1995).
Bourdo (1956) provides an extensive review of problems associated with the use of GLO
information for quantitative analyses, and describes statistical tests used to determine
if the data is biased. Surveyors' preferences for select species have been found at some
locations; a few surveyors favored beech for marking as bearing trees because the bark did
not have to be removed, while others preferred loose-barked trees (Bourdo 1956). Biases in
species selection can usually be detected, whereas biases in diameter estimates cannot.
There are a few notorious instances in which a surveyor fabricated data. Such areas were
identified by comparing GLO notes on stream crossings and wetlands with the actual
locations of those features, and problem areas were later resurveyed. In spite of some
biases at some locations, GLO data are still considered useful by the scientific community
because biases are not widespread or significant enough to render the information
inaccurate if interpreted at the proper spatial scale (Almendinger 1997, Bourdo 1956,
1983), and the degree of bias can be evaluated for most applications.
While information derived from GLO notes has long been used to construct maps of the
historic forest, critics of such maps contend that conditions depicted merely represent
those that existed at a single point in time, hence have limited value in comprehending
conditions dating further back in time. We regard this logic specious in several respects,
based on evidence presented in the following discussion.
Maps generated from GLO data are based on a single measurement of forest conditions during
the early to mid-nineteenth century. However, their interpretation must be based on
considerations of periodicity, location, and overall amount of change in forested
ecosystems in relationship to (1) climatic fluctuations, (2) natural disturbance regimes,
and (3) physical substrates that direct or limit change. Perhaps best stated by Frelich
(1995), "The presettlement data can be interpreted as a stable baseline and used to
evaluate changes in the landscape caused by humans. Such an evaluation is possible because
the geographic distributions of major tree species, such as maples, pines, and oaks, have
only changed by 4-10 km/century over the last 10,000 years and have changed little in the
last 3,000 years." Webb et al. (1993), Davis et al. (1993), and Brubaker (1975)
corroborate these conclusions regarding the effects of climate change on tree species
distribution.
While distributions of forest species became stable at least 3,000 years ago in the Lake
States, the locations of some species, and their successional states, have varied within
the region over time. These finer-scaled changes in distribution are brought about by
minor climatic fluctuations like the Little Ice Age; natural disturbance regimes of fire,
wind and flooding; and population cycles of insects and disease-causing organisms. These
agents of change do not impact all ecosystems equally. Certain conditions of the physical
environment make some ecosystems more susceptible to rapid changes than others; this
susceptibility depends on landform controlled soil, topographic, and hydrologic
conditions, and the way in which landform juxtaposition contributes to or limits the
spread of disturbance (Swanson et al. 1988, Host et al. 1987). Physical factors often act
as boundaries that contain certain kinds of disturbance, and these boundaries are
relatively invariant over centuries. Biological conditions are also linked to the rate of
change in species and successional patch locations because of species-specific
reproductive strategies and life expectancy.
Forest type distributions are correlated with conditions of the physical substrate, with
pine on "coarse-textured soils derived from outwash and ice-contact deposits,"
which in turn "promoted a vegetation type which was extremely susceptible to
fire" (Whitney 1986). Northern hardwood and hemlock-hardwood forests are found on
fine to medium textured till soils on glacial moraines. These requirements of forest
species for certain moisture and nutrient conditions precluded widespread or drastic
changes in composition of the original forests in the Lake States area; pines were always
restricted to droughty sandy landforms, hemlock-hardwood forests to nutrient-rich glacial
till, and wetland conifers to areas with suitable hydrologic conditions.
Changes in the location of forest species and their successional patches are more apparent
when viewed at a landscape scale within the context of the regional setting. At this
scale, typically measured in tens of thousands of acres, mesophilic, wind-driven
ecosystems were composed mostly of long-lived tree species (e.g., sugar maple, yellow
birch, hemlock). Changes within these forests were caused primarily by fine scale
blowdowns of one-tenth to one-quarter acre in size; rarely, catastrophic winds
woulddemolish a larger patch averaging a few hundred acres in size (Frelich and Lorimer
1991, Canham and Loucks 1984). Long-lived species regenerated in the small windthrow gaps
(Davis et al. 1993, Frelich et al. 1993), and short-lived species only gained temporary
dominance in the rare large openings. Thus, these "asbestos" forests exhibited a
repeating yet shifting steady state of fine-scaled mosaics of species whose overall
proportions remained essentially constant (Borman and Likens 1979), and which were greatly
dominated by long-lived forest species.
At the same spatial scale, pyrophilic, fire-regulated ecosystems on dry, nutrient-poor
landforms supported both long-lived tree species (e.g., white and red pine) and
short-lived species (e.g., jack pine, aspen, white birch). Locations of forest patches in
these systems changed over time due to disturbances from wildfire and Native American
sources; changes were more frequent and dramatic than in the mesic hemlock-hardwood
forests. Cover types were replaced in patches of hundreds to thousands of acres within
several decades to a century or more. Vegetation types were variously openlands, barrens,
or dense coniferous forest depending fire frequency and the length of time elapsed since
fire disturbance. Age classes and patch configurations generally followed an
ecosystem-dependent periodicity and spatial pattern associated with the fire-dominated
disturbance regimes. The natural condition of fire-regulated systems was therefore a state
of disequilibrium for individual areas, with representation of the entire range of
successional states present in the larger regional area.
Frelich (1995) estimated that before settlement, 89% of the northern hardwoods, and 55% of
the mixed white and red pine, spruce-fir-birch, and oak-hickory forests of the Lake States
were in an old growth condition. These estimates were based on an assumption that
old-growth conditions were attained at an age of 120 years or greater for long-lived
communities such as northern hardwoods, and 80 years for short-lived species such as
aspen, birch, and jack pine. The very old age of the majority of northern hardwood
ecosystems indicates that not many short-lived species were present, and that overall
species composition and age-class distribution would have been relatively stable. This
contrasts with fire-dependent ecosystems such as spruce-fir, aspen-birch, and jack pine,
which consisted of forests characterized by a more even age class distribution.
Pielou (1991) introduced the concept of ecological inertia and cited this phenomenon as an
additional factor leading to the relative stability of forest communities, even during
minor climatic fluctuations. She defined ecological inertia as the lag in forest change
due to plant persistence, with established communities physically preventing encroachment
by other species that were better adapted to changed climatic conditions. She asserted
that vegetation is slow to respond to climatic change, hence a short-duration change may
not produce a response in species' geographic distribution simply because species would
not have time to migrate. This delayed response of vegetation to short-term climatic
change may explain why the biogeography of forest trees changed steadily following
Pleistocene glaciation, without any reversals in the direction of the change. She noted
that, in addition to ecological inertia, natural selection for progeny adapted to changed
conditions also resulted in stability.
In summary, the maps of historic vegetation found on this website are a reasonable
reflection of forest composition in the northern Lake States over a long time period, with
only minor fluctuations in the location of short-lived forest types within mesophilic
ecosystems, and changing yet predictable patterns within pyrophilic ecosystems.
Integrating this information on past natural vegetation with other knowledge about the
biological and physical environment, and disturbance regimes, will allow us to develop
spatially explicit estimates of the characteristic rate of natural change, technically
termed the dynamics of homeorhetic stability (Reice 1994, O'Neill et al. 1986), that
formerly distinguished and influenced the landscape and local ecosystems of the Lake
States.
References
Almendinger, J.C. 1997. Minnesota Bearing Tree Data Base. Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources Biological Report No. 56.
Bourdo, E.A., Jr. 1956. A Review of the General Land Office survey and of its Use in
Quantitative Studies of Former Forests. Ecology 37:754-768.
Bourdo, E.A., Jr. 1983. The Forest the Settlers Saw. Pp. 3-16. In: S.L. Flader, ed. The
Great Lakes Forest: An Environmental and Social History. University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis, MN. 336 p.
Borman, F.H. and G.E. Likens. 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. 253p.
Springer-Verlag, New York.
Brubaker, L.B. 1975. Postglacial Forest Patterns Associated with Till and Outwash in
Northcentral Upper Michigan. Quaternary Research 5: 499-527.
Canham, C. D., and O. L. Loucks. 1984. Catastrophic windthrow in the presettlement forests
of Wisconsin. Ecology 65(3):803-809.
Cottam, G. 1949. The Phytosociology of an Oak Woods in Southwestern Wisconsin. Ecology
30:271-287.
Cottam, G., and J.T. Curtis. 1956. The use of Distance Measures in Phytosociological
Sampling. Ecology 37:451-460.
Curtis, J.T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin - An Ordination of Plant Communitites. The
University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Davis, M.B. 1981. Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities. Pp. 132-153.
In: West, D.C., H.H. Shugart, and D.B. Botkin, eds. Forest Succession: Concepts and
Application. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Davis, M. B., S. Sugita, R. R. Calcote, J. B. Ferrari, and L. E. Frelich. 1993. Historical
development of alternate communities in a hemlock-hardwood forest in northern Michigan,
U.S.A. Pp. 19-39. In: P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb, N.R., editors. Large-Scale
Ecology and Conservation Biology: The 35th Symposium of the British Ecological Society
with the Society for Conservation Biology. University of Southampton. Boston, MA:
Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Forman, R.T.t. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York.
Frelich, L. E. 1995. Old forest in the Lake States today and before European settlement.
Natural Areas Journal 15:157-167.
Frelich, L. E., and C. G. Lorimer. 1991. Natural disturbance regimes in hemlock-hardwood
forests of the Upper Great Lakes Region. Ecological Monographs 61(2):159-162.
Frelich, L.E.; Calcote, R.R.; Davis, M.B.; Pastor, J. 1993. Patch formation and
maintenance in an old-growth hemlock-hardwood forest. Ecology 74(2):513-527.
Host, G.E.; Pregitzer, K.S; Ramm, C.W.; Hart, J.B.; Cleland D.T. 1987. Landform mediated
differences in successional pathways among upland forest ecosystems in northwestern Lower
Michigan. Forest Science 33:445-457.
Loucks, O.L. 1983. New Light on the Changing Forest. Pp. 17-32. In: S.L. Flader, ed. The
Great Lakes Forest: An Environmental and Social History. University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis, MN. 336 p.
O'Neill, R.V., D.L. DeAngelis, J.B. Waide, and T.F.H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept
of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Pielou, E.C. 1991. After the Ice Age: the return of life to glaciated North America. The
University of Chicago Press.
Reice, S.R. 1994. Nonequilibira Determinants of Biological Community Structure. American
Scientist. Volume 82. Pp 424-435.
Runkle, J. R. 1982. Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of eastern
North America. Ecology 63(5):1533-1546.
Stearns, F. 1949. Ninety years change in a northern hardwood forest in Wisconsin. Ecology
30(3):350-358.
Stearns, F. 1995. History of Wisconsin's northern forests and the pine barrens. In: E. A.
Borgerding, G. A. Bartelt, and W. M. McCown, eds. The Future of Pine Barrens in Northwest
Wisconsin: A Workshop Summary: proceedings of the workshop; 1993 September 21-23; Solon
Springs, WI. PUBL-RS-913-94. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: 4-6.
Swanson, F.J.; Kratz, T.K.; Caine, N.; Woodmansee, R.G. 1988. Landform effects on
ecosystem patterns and processes. BioScience 38:92-98.
Webb, T., III; Bartlein, P.J.; Harrison, S.P.; Anderson, K.H. 1993. Vegetation, lake
levels, and climate in eastern North America for the past 18,000 years. Pp. 415-467. In:
Wright, H.E, Jr..; Kutzbach, J.E.; Webb, T., III; Ruddiman, W.F.; Street-Perrot, F.A.;
Bartlein, P.J., eds. Global Climates since the Last Glacial Maximum. Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
Whitney, G. G. 1986. Relation of Michigan's presettlement pine forests to substrate and
disturbance history. Ecology 67(6):1548-1559.
Whitney, G. G. 1987. An ecological history of the Great Lakes forest of Michigan. Journal
of Ecology 75:667-684.
Return to Historic Vegetation Theme