glaheader.gif (3270 bytes)
Ecological Classification Systems

Trill2.gif (25882 bytes)


subsecti1.gif (9598 bytes) Ecoregional boundaries in this map are based upon the terrestrial National Hierarchy of Ecological Units (Cleland et al. 1997), and show the approximate location of divisions between ecological units at different spatial scales. The Province level of ecological classification divides the northern deciduous-coniferous forest biome from the oak-hickory-prairie biome. This change in biome composition is primarily due to broad-scale climatic influences of solar radiation, length of growing season, and annual precipitation. Section level divisions within Province 212 reflect changes in ecosystems based on lake-effect climate, different bedrock types, and associations of glacial deposits.

Subsection divisions show differences that are mostly due to surficial geologic systems, such as areas dominated by glacial moraines as opposed to lakebeds or outwash plains, as reflected by patterns in potential natural vegetation. Provinces were mapped by Bailey (1989a, 1989b). Sections and Subsections, adapted from work by Albert et al. (1996), were mapped by interagency teams.  The National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units is a regionalization, classification and mapping system for stratifying the Earth into progressively smaller areas of increasingly uniform ecological potentials. Ecological types are classified and ecological units are mapped based on associations of environmental and biological factors that directly affect or indirectly express energy, moisture, disturbance, and nutrient gradients which regulate the structure and function of ecosystems. These factors include climate, geology, geomorphology, water, soils, and potential natural vegetation. Using these factors, the National Hierarchy of Ecological Units organizes and defines biophysical environments, or the environmental components of ecosystems, into an orderly set of spatial scales based on measurable features and processes. The National Hierarchy takes the infinite variety of ecosystems and places them into a limited number of discrete, practical units that are mappable, repeatable, and distinguished from one another by differences in various structural or functional characteristics.

Albert, D.A.; Denton S.R.; Barnes, B.V. 1986. Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 32 p.

Bailey, R.G. 1980. Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Miscellaneous Publication 1391. 77 p.

Bailey, R.G. 1989a. Ecoregions of the continents (map). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Scale 1:30,000,000.

Bailey, R.G. 1989b. Explanatory supplement to the ecoregions map of the continents. Environmental Conservation 15(4):307-309.

Cleland, David T., Peter E. Avers, Henry McNab, Mark E. Jensen, Robert G. Bailey, Thomas King, and Walter E. Russell. 1997. National Hierarchy of Ecological Units. Yale University Press, New Haven & London. In (Mark S. Boyce and Alan Haney editors) Ecosystem Management: Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources. pp 181-200

 



The following higher resolution version of the above map may be viewed by clicking the link below.

File Name Format Resolution Size
subsecti.gif GIF 880x680 32kb

For more information, contact

David Cleland
USDA-Forest Service
Southern Research Station
5985 Highway K, Rhinelander, WI 54501

Phone: 715-362-1117
Email: dcleland@fs.fed.us

Return to Ecological Classification Systems Theme


GLA150.gif (6117 bytes)