Interpolation Techniques for Late-Spring Freeze Data
The freeze maps were made using observations from 424
National Weather Service (NWS) sites. For locations between the
NWS sites, values were interpolated using inverse distance squared
weighting (IDSW). This
common interpolation technique computes the value at a specific
location from all known values, with closer stations having more
influence on the end result.
An alternative way to compute these values is to treat them
as a function of latitude, longitude, and elevation, using an approach
called linear regression.
Inverse Distance Squared Weighting is a
technique that computes a value for some quantity at a location based
on the values of the quantity at other locations where it was measured
or known. In IDSW, the influence of each known value depends on
its distance from the point for which the value is being determined.
Mathematically, the value is computed according to the
formula:
|
|
|
where N is the
number of locations where the quantity is known or measured;
xi is the value of the quantity at location i;
di is the distance between point i and
the point for which x is being determined. |
For more information on IDSW, the reader is advised to
consult a textbook on statistics or spatial analysis of data.
Linear Regression is another way to
interpolate the data from known locations. This assumes the
variables depend on latitude, longitude, and elevation at any
location. The exact form of the dependence is determined
mathematically in such a way that the error between the regression
values and the observed values at all known locations is minimized.
For the freeze variables discussed here, linear regression produces
errors comparable to those from IDSW.
The basic form of these regression equations is:
y(lat, lon, elev) = a + b1*lat +
b2*lon + b3*elev
Readers who would prefer to compute values of the variables
using linear regression may do so, using the information in the
following table:
| Threshold |
Variable |
a |
b1 |
b2 |
b3 |
r2 |
| 50 GDD |
Dt |
-231 |
7.98 |
0.37 |
0.02 |
0.93 |
| Df |
-134 |
6.28 |
0.48 |
0.03 |
0.93 |
| Tf |
-10.2 |
0.214 |
0.02 |
-7.2x10-4 |
0.68 |
| nf |
114 |
-2.26 |
0.055 |
0.0095 |
0.61 |
| 100 GDD |
Dt |
-153 |
6.94 |
0.55 |
0.02 |
0.93 |
| Df |
-106 |
5.97 |
0.53 |
0.03 |
0.92 |
| Tf |
-7.86 |
0.179 |
0.019 |
-7.3x10-4 |
0.65 |
| nf |
65.7 |
-1.41 |
-0.0017 |
0.0071 |
0.55 |
| 150 GDD |
Dt |
-117 |
6.42 |
0.60 |
0.021 |
0.93 |
| Df |
-82.7 |
5.71 |
0.59 |
0.028 |
0.91 |
| Tf |
-6.22 |
0.152 |
0.020 |
-6.1x10-4 |
0.59 |
| nf |
40.6 |
-0.893 |
-0.004 |
0.0051 |
0.48 |
| 200 GDD |
Dt |
-91.3 |
6.08 |
0.64 |
0.022 |
0.93 |
| Df |
-65.1 |
5.55 |
0.65 |
0.030 |
0.89 |
| Tf |
-5.22 |
0.132 |
0.019 |
-4.1x10-4 |
0.52 |
| nf |
25.51 |
-0.567 |
-0.0027 |
0.0037 |
0.43 |
| 250 GDD |
Dt |
-72.4 |
5.83 |
0.67 |
0.024 |
0.93 |
| Df |
-52.4 |
5.53 |
0.73 |
0.03 |
0.89 |
| Tf |
-4.23 |
0.126 |
0.024 |
-7.4x10-4 |
0.43 |
| nf |
16.5 |
-0.373 |
-0.0033 |
0.0023 |
0.40 |
| 300 GDD |
Dt |
-57.1 |
5.67 |
0.70 |
0.025 |
0.93 |
| Df |
-48.5 |
5.64 |
0.77 |
0.029 |
0.89 |
| Tf |
-3.38 |
0.087 |
0.014 |
-4.6x10-4 |
0.29 |
| nf |
10.9 |
-0.248 |
-6.7x10-4 |
0.0017 |
0.37 |
|
|
where Dt is the
average day on which a threshold is reached; Df
is the average day of all freezes after the threshold; Tf
is the average temperature of freezes after the threshold;
and nf is the average number of freezes after the
threshold.
The final column, r2, is the correlation coefficient
for the specific threshold variable. It indicates the
percentage of variability in the quantity that is reproduced by
the regression equation. A value of r2=1.0 would
mean the regression equation completely reproduces the observed
values at all locations, a perfect fit. A value of r2=0.0
means that there is no relationship between the equation and the
observations. |
For more information:
|