Betting on Knowledge to Help Save a Bat Species
![[Photograph]: Sybill Amelon holds a bat with a radio transmitter](/4154/local-resources/images/sybill1.jpg) Public attitudes towards bats have transformed in recent years, as word has
spread about the beneficial services bats perform. As our appreciation grows, so
too does our concern about the endangered status of gray bats and Indiana bats.
An effort to protect both species' wintering caves has paid off in a recovery
for the gray bat. But Indiana bat numbers have continued to decline, from about
500,000 in 1991 to about 300,000 today, according to Sybill Amelon, a wildlife
biologist at NC's Central Hardwood Ecosystem unit in Columbia, MO.
Amelon became interested in the Indiana bat when she was writing biological
impact statements on the Mark Twain National Forest in Missouri. "We would try
to find the best scientific knowledge on local bats, and there was often nothing
known. In particular, with the Indiana bat, you just could not find any
supporting research to determine if forest management practices would impact
their population," says Amelon.
Amelon decided to try to fill in those gaps. In particular, she hopes to gain
a better understanding of the home range, movements, and habitats used by
several different species of eastern forest bats, and to translate that into
management guidelines that could help maintain healthy populations of all
species.
Listening in on bats
Amelon and her coworkers combine two methods to track
bat movements. The traditional method is to drape mist nets over waterways and
flyways to capture the animals and attach very small radio transmitters to them.
Some species, including the Indiana bat, are difficult to catch with nets, so
the team is also using acoustical devices that pick up the bats' unique
echolocation signals.
With both the acoustic and telemetry information, the team can map out the
distinctive habitats and home ranges of different types of bats. They'd like to
identify the characteristics of high quality roosting and foraging habitat for
each species. So far, they've found that the northern long-eared bat, Indiana
bat, and gray bat tend to stick to more heavily wooded habitat, whereas red bats
and pipistrelle bats prefer the edges of forest openings.
Amelon says that these findings suggest
that red bats or pipistrelle bats are well
suited to adapt to management and
other disturbances in their home
ranges.
![[Photograph]: close up of a bat](/4154/local-resources/images/bat1.jpg) The results have practical importance
for managers at the Mark Twain
National Forest, according to Jody Eberly, a wildlife biologist on the Mark
Twain. "We need to understand how
the bats use national forest habitat so
that we're not contributing to the
decline of any species, but at the same
time we're able to provide forest
products," she says.
The bat-human interface
One study is being conducted in an undeveloped
area of the Mark Twain National Forest,
while the other is in the interface
between an urban and rural area.
"We're comparing how the bats use
habitats in areas that have lots of
disturbance with how they use habitats
in areas of low disturbance. If there isn't
a difference, that's a strong indication
that human disturbance in the summer
habitat is not one of the problems
associated with the (Indiana bat's)
decline. It's kind of a process of
elimination," Amelon says. It's a process
she hopes will prevent another kind of
elimination for one of our important
bat species.
Source: NC News, Fall 2002
|